(Performance Averaged Over 5 U.S. Climate Zones)
Tables below and corresponding Energy-Savings to Investment Ratio (E-SIR) were prepared using with data from a little-known report for the U.S. Department of Energy; summarized below. The complete report, except for Appendices D & E, may be downloaded via these links: Title & Index (50 kB) 1-27 (820 kB) 28-45 (406 kB) 46-73 (947 kB) 74-82 (351 kB) 83-102 (643 kB) App-A,B,C,F (546 kB)
This report is consistent with the 152-page GFX-Grant evaluation for DOEs Office of Energy Related Inventions (OERI). Its first two parts may be downloaded from these links: Grant Approval Letters (300 kB) & M. Pravda (421 kB)
Water Heating in Europe is much different; particularly in Germany, which has 7.2 million households with instantaneous systems and only 4 million households that use electric storage water heaters as their main hot water source; according to a report by the Austrian Energy Agency that may be downloaded from these links: Summary (59 kB) Report (541 kB)
Estimated savings are averages over 5 U.S. Climate Zones for medium residential annual consumption of 3764 kWh/yr. Savings can be much higher for heavy [6618 kWh/yr] residential users. The total "Site Energy Savings" would be about 0.43 billion kWh/yr at a total first incremental greening cost of about $210 million for these 325,000 systems. The latter represents about 8% of the annual replacement rate of 4 million electric storage water heaters [e.g. 1.6 million for households with 3 or more occupants and 1.3 million for single family homes]. "Primary Energy Savings" are higher by a factor of 3.2. |
Heavy Residential User of 6618 kWh/yr Costing $562.53 @ 8.5’/kWh1 |
||||||
System |
Type |
Annual Savings kWh/yr |
Greening Cost |
Payback In Years @ 8.5’/kWh |
||
NAECA Standard |
66 gal. |
Consumption |
Installed Cost |
N/A |
||
A |
Multifunction HPWH |
4100 |
$1000 |
2.9 |
||
B |
Add-On HPWH |
3510 |
$860 |
2.9 |
||
C |
Solar [Thermal] |
3080 |
$2750 |
10.5 |
||
D |
GFX Model G3-60 or S4-60 |
2250 |
$400 |
2.1 |
||
E |
Tankless |
1280 |
$500 |
4.6 |
||
F |
Desuperheater |
1020 |
$600 |
6.9 |
||
Green-Bundle |
|
|
|
|
||
CDE |
Solar/GFX/ Tankless |
6610 |
$3150 |
5.6 vs. 10.5 |
||
CD |
Solar/GFX |
5330 |
$3150 |
6.9 |
||
CE |
Solar/Tankless |
4360 |
$2750 New Construction |
7.4 |
||
ED |
GFX/Tankless |
3530 |
$400 |
1.3 vs. 4.6 (E) |
||
BD |
GFX/HPWH |
5940 |
$1260 |
2.5 |
||
AD |
GFX/MF-HPWH |
6350 |
$1400 |
2.6 |
||
FD |
GFX/Desuperheater |
3270 |
$1000 |
3.6 v. 6.9 (F) |
||
Medium Residential User of 3764 kWh/yr Costing $318.75 @ 8.5’/kWh |
||||||
System |
Type |
Annual Savings kWh/yr |
Greening Cost |
Payback In Years @ 8.5’/kWh |
||
NAECA |
66 gal. |
Consumption |
Installed Cost |
N/A |
||
A |
Multifunction HPWH |
2500 |
$1000 |
4.7 |
||
B |
Add-On HPWH |
2070 |
$860 |
4.9 |
||
C |
Solar [Thermal] |
2420 |
$2750 |
13.4 |
||
D |
GFX Model G3-60 or S4-60 |
1280 Electric: 1760 kWh Gas: 96 Therm |
$400 |
3.7 |
||
E |
Tankless |
1280 |
$500 |
4.6 |
||
F |
Desuperheater |
610 |
$600 |
11.6 |
||
Green-Bundle |
|
|
|
|
||
CDE |
Solar/GFX/ Tankless |
4980 |
$3150 New Construction |
7.4 vs. 13.4 (Solar Only C) |
||
CD |
Solar/GFX |
3700 |
$3150 |
10 |
||
CE |
Solar/Tankless |
3700 |
$2750 New Construction |
8.7 |
||
ED |
GFX/Tankless |
2568 |
$400 |
1.8 vs. 4.6 (E) |
||
BD |
GFX/HPWH |
3350 |
$1260 |
4.5 |
||
AD |
GFX/MF-HPWH |
3780 |
$1400 |
4.4 |
||
FD |
GFX/Desuperheater |
1890 |
$1000 |
6.2 v. 11.6 (F) |
||
FOOTNOTE 1. Estimates for whole-house On-Demand (Tankless) water heaters were substituted for Point-of-Use units because they also eliminate standby loss and have lower installed costs as compared to EEI/DOE estimates of $1800 & $1100 for multiple Point-of-Use units for heavy users & medium users, respectively. (See Final Report for DOE/EEI Joint Water Heater Initiative, Electric Water Heating Situation Analysis, Reference #31186, Final Report to EEI/DOE December 6, 1996 by A.D. Little, Inc., Acorn Park, Cambridge, MA 02140-2390) |
||||||
|
© 2005 Waterfilm Energy, Inc.